Why Should Gun Laws Not Be Stricter

A study published in Applied Economics Letters found that “assault gun bans did not significantly affect homicide rates at the state level” and that “states with restrictions on concealed firearms had higher gun killings.” [103] Although gun ownership doubled in the twentieth century, the murder rate declined. [53] John R. Lott, Jr., Ph.D., author of More Guns, Less Crime: Understanding Crime and Gun Control Laws, said, “States with the largest increases in gun ownership also have the largest declines in violent crime. The impact on these crimes [in which two or more people were killed] was dramatic. When states passed these laws, the number of multi-victim shootings dropped by 84 percent. The number of deaths due to these shootings decreased by an average of 90% and the number of wounded by 82%. [54] More than two-thirds of gun owners cite protection as the main reason for owning a gun. [55] Journalist John Stossel said, “Criminals don`t obey the law. Without the fear of retaliation from victims who might grab the heat, criminals who possess these [illegal] weapons now have a much easier job.

As the saying goes, “If guns are banned, only outlaws will have guns.” [56] Gunshot wounds are often life-changing and have indelible effects on victims` long-term mental and physical health. Some require lifelong lifelong care, and many others lose their ability to work, especially in physically demanding jobs. However, there are virtually no programmes for adequate long-term care, rehabilitation and retraining. The toll of gun violence on victims, family members and medical services has led to a chronic public health crisis – with remarkably little government response. Access to affordable, quality health services in the United States should include necessary long-term health interventions, including long-term pain management, rehabilitation and other support services, as well as mental health care. In October 2017, a gunman on the thirty-second floor of the Mandalay Bay Resort and Casino in Las Vegas, Nevada, opened fire on a crowd of spectators, killing fifty-eight people before killing himself. More than 500 people were injured in the attack, which surpassed the 2016 Orlando shooting as the deadliest mass shooting in modern U.S. history. Authorities found twenty-three guns in the shooter`s hotel room, including twelve rifles equipped with an impact rifle stock, an accessory that allows a semi-automatic rifle to quickly expel ammunition like a fully automatic rifle. Without the bump fire stocks, which were legally acquired in the Las Vegas shooting case, the shooter wouldn`t have been able to fire as many shots as possible. Before the incident, most Americans didn`t know about Bump Fire stocks and began to wonder if they should be legally available.

Gun control advocates have called for a ban on devices, similar to fully automatic assault weapons. Critics of such a proposal have argued that bump stocks are not difficult to create and could be made on a 3D printer. As a first step, States should recognize armed violence as a threat to people`s human rights, in particular their right to life, physical integrity and security, and to health. The gun control debate in the United States has grown and diminished over the years, sparked by a series of mass shootings of gunmen in civilian contexts. In particular, the murder of twenty schoolchildren in Newtown, Connecticut, in 2012 sparked a new national debate on gun laws. However, a bill that would have banned semi-automatic assault weapons was defeated in the Senate despite widespread public support. Armed violence can lead to a violation of the most basic human right – the right to life. States have an obligation to address real or foreseeable threats to life and should therefore take measures to protect individuals from armed violence. Support for stricter laws has grown after some of the worst gun violence in U.S.

history. These include mass shootings at Columbine High School in Littleton, Colorado, in 1999; Sandy Hook Elementary School in Newtown, Connecticut, in 2012; a music festival in Las Vegas in 2017; and Marjory Stoneman Douglas High School in Parkland, Florida in 2018. Assembly President Carl Heastie said: “My colleagues and I, in the majority of the Assembly, have worked tirelessly for years to combat the scourge of armed violence that has plagued this country for too long. In just 10 days, two horrific shootings claimed the lives of 31 innocent people in Uvalde, Texas, and here in Buffalo, New York, including children, in places where they should have felt safe. Together with our Senate colleagues and Governor Hochul, we have worked to ensure that New York`s gun laws are the strongest in the country, because we believe every American deserves to feel safe. I`m proud of our efforts here in New York, but this country needs to have a serious conversation about its obscene fascination with guns and assault weapons so that every American can live without fear that gun violence will destroy their communities. The right to own and bear arms was added to the United States Constitution as part of the Bill of Rights, ratified on December 15, 1791. The exact meaning and purpose of the Second Amendment has been the subject of much debate.

Gun control advocates argue that when the newly formed country passed the Second Amendment in 1791, each state maintained a militia made up of ordinary citizens serving as part-time soldiers. According to the amendment, these militias were “well regulated” – subject to government requirements for training, firearms and regular military exercises. Fearing that the federal government would use its standing army to impose its will on the states, the authors of the Second Amendment sought to protect the right of state militias to bear arms. According to some gun control advocates, the change was only about protecting the right of states to arm their own armed forces, including their National Guard units, today. About half of Americans (53%) favor stricter gun laws, down from 2019, according to the Center`s April 2021 survey. The lowest proportions say these laws are roughly correct (32%) or should be less strict (14%). The percentage of Americans who say gun laws should be stricter dropped 60% in September 2019. Current opinions are as of March 2017.

Preferences for gun laws in the U.S. continue to vary widely from party to party. Currently, 86 percent of Democrats, 60 percent of independents and 27 percent of Republicans say gun sales laws should be made stricter. Readings between the three partisan groups have declined since June. The most recent declines are 11 points for Republicans, eight points for Democrats and six points for independents. Today, a large majority of Democrats and Democrats (81%) say gun laws should be stricter, although that percentage has decreased slightly since 2019 (by 86%). The Second Amendment to the U.S. Constitution states: “A well-regulated militia necessary for the security of a free state, the right of the people to bear and bear arms shall not be violated.” Gun ownership is an American tradition that predates the country itself and is protected by the Second Amendment.

More gun control laws would violate the right to bear arms.